- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
401k 401k match 1974 1987 2001-2002 2008-2009 active duty advisor search alternative minimum tax area agency on aging asset allocation atm automobiles bad debt bank fees banking banking on-line banking relationships banks black monday brazil bric capital gains career transition caregiver 101 care manager car loans cash management charity china commodities compound interest core series cpa credit credit card credit reports credit union debit card debt decision making deflation desires directive to physicians divorce djia dollar cost averaging downsizing ea economic education elder care employment energy credits estate planning estate tax family care giver federal reserve fee-only fiduciary financial financial planning flexible spending account foreign markets foreign stocks gifting goals and objectives good debt government grat guardianship happiness harvesting losses healthcare hedging homeowner tax credit housing i-bonds identity theft income tax income tax preparation india inflation insurance interest rates investing investments ira irs itemized deductions japan laddering layoff life insurance trust linkedin long-term care lost decade marginal tax rates medicaid medicare medicare supplement medigap money mortgage napfa nasdaq ncua needs net-operating loss carryforward net worth new year's resolutions nine minutes non-mortgage debt occupational outlook handbook personality power of attorney profit sharing plan quarterly update real estate refinance regulation retirement plan contributions retirement planning retirement plans retirement relocation risk tolerance roth ira russia schedule c schedule d sep simple ira social security spending spending plan standard deduction stimulus check stock market recovery stock markets tax credits tax loss harvesting tips total return strategies unemployment unemployment benefits upsizing us news & world report webinar wills women
Making Cents
Subscribe
Viewing entries tagged with 'healthcare'
New Careers After Age 50
New Careers After Age 50
Where The Jobs Are, How to Spruce Up Your Skills and Ready Your Finances for the Change
During the recent recession, many have found themselves back in the job market after age 50 due to layoffs or changing demands at their employers. Yet as life expectancies lengthen, a late career change isn’t always a negative. It may be a welcome chance to renew, re-educate and restart a full life.
It’s possible that in the future, an over-50 career change might become a common event, maybe even a desired event in our society – which means it’s definitely worth planning for.
A visit to a fiduciary fee-only financial planner might be a good first step in planning a move to a second career or dealing with a sudden change in your career prospects. You need to plan for any possible change in income up or down in any opportunity you entertain. You’ll also need to plan how you’ll afford any training you’ll need – college or otherwise – in making that successful transition. To make an over-50 career transition successful, it’s all about preparation. So here are some ideas:
Start with research: One of the best-detailed, up-to-the-minute career resources for the types of jobs that exist in this country and their salary and hiring forecasts is the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Occupational Outlook Handbook. This extensive online resource not only lists major career groups, but the leading occupations in it. If you haven’t been in the job market for awhile, this kind of research is a good way to reset your knowledge of your industry and whether its hiring prospects are bright. This database also lays out the need for the necessary training required to reach certain salary and career levels.
Check industries that are friendly to older workers: Healthcare and education are just two industries that are more welcoming to older workers. U.S. News & World Report has come up with its own list of popular over-50 occupations, and it’s a good starting point for people looking for flexible scheduling and other workers their age in the field.
Network: Face-to-face contact with people in your target fields is important. If you can, check out events at professional organizations in that field or attend casual networking functions to learn more. Being someone over 50, you can get an idea of whether there’s true age diversity in a field and how all those groups work together – or if you’re simply the oldest person in the room. Obviously if you feel welcome, networking will give you a better idea of which companies with someone with your maturity and experience might fit in. Consider adding your profile/resume to Linkedin.
Are you Prepared to Pay for Long Term Care?
ARE YOU PREPARED TO PAY FOR LONG TERM CARE?
In the coming years, many Americans will face the challenge.
70% of people currently over age 65 will require some long term care someday. That is the estimate of the U.S. Administration on Aging, a division of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.(source) Will Medicare or private health insurance pay for it? The short answer is “no”.
In the decades ahead, baby boomers will reach their seventies, eighties and nineties. With aging parents of their own, some are learning how much long term care really costs. Some are still unaware.
How many of us are financially prepared for the possibility? Here are a couple of “averages” to consider from MetLife’s 2009 survey of LTC costs. The average annual cost of nursing home care is now $79,935 or $219 per day. That’s up 3.3% from 2008. The average nursing home stay is about 2.5 years, which means you would need roughly $200,000 to pay those bills.(source)
Can you imagine paying it out of pocket? Taking out a reverse mortgage to do it? Using Medicaid because you have nothing left? No one wants these financial circumstances. The clear answer is long term care insurance coverage.
How expensive is LTC coverage? Annually, it typically costs about as much as a cheap used car. MarketWatch cited an example from the MetLife survey: in 2009, a 52-year-old federal employee could pay $1,524 annually for an LTC policy with a $200-per-day benefit for three years and a maximum lifetime benefit of about $200,000.(source)
House Narrowly Passes Healthcare Reform Bill
HOUSE NARROWLY PASSES HEALTHCARE REFORM BILL
Will the Senate follow?
A narrow victory in the House of Representatives. The Affordable Health Care for America Act (H.R. 3962) passed 220-215 in the House of Representatives on the night of November 7, with 39 Democrats voting no and a lone Republican (Rep. Anh Cao of Louisiana) voting yes.(source) While President Obama lauded passage of the House version of the bill as “historic” and “courageous”, it is still questionable whether any consensus reform bill will land on the President’s desk by the end of 2009.
A tough fight ahead in another. Right now, the Democratic caucus has the 60 votes needed in the Senate. However, Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Connecticut) says he will readily break away and join the Republican filibuster if the Senate version of the bill includes a public option. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) says it will.(source)
The Health Care Debate
CLEARING UP THE HEALTH CARE DEBATE
Who would fund the reforms? Would there really be a “death list”?
The town hall debates over health care reform have ignited Americans like few recent issues. Discourses have become shouting matches. Away from the noise, here is a roundup of where things currently stand.
Who would pay for all this? Over the next 10 years, the federal government will need (by President Obama’s estimation) $950 billion to fund the prosposed health care programs. As planned, roughly a third of the money will be raised through increased revenues (i.e., limiting tax deductions for the wealthiest Americans) and two-thirds of it is supposed to come from reallocations of taxpayer money the federal government is already scheduled to receive(think Medicare savings on the elderly).(source) A coalition of pharmaceutical industry CEOs met with the President in July and have since pledged $80 billion in cost savings over the coming decade to help pay for the reform.(source) From the August 7, 2009 Kiplinger Tax Letter, this is the 2007 tax return data from the IRS: It is apparent who will pay for health care reform, especially with the proposed income tax increases.
Could Small Business Cope with Mandatory Health Insurance?
What would they have to do if health care reforms pass?
Health Care Reform
HEALTH CARE REFORM
The U.S. is the only developed nation without a comprehensive national health care system. President Barack Obama aims to change all that with a massive reform bill to bring health insurance to 46 million Americans without it over the next 10 years.
Huge reform, huge questions. How much will this cost? Who will pay for it? Could the reform put private health insurers out of business? Will it work? These are just some of the questions swirling around the proposed legislation.
Huge compromises. The most controversial aspects of the bill may soon be watered down. Part of that has to do with cost; part of it has to do with appeasing the private sector. The Senate and House must reconcile different versions of the bill. In the House version, 95% of Americans would be eligible for health coverage; in the Senate version, 97% of Americans would qualify.1,2
Possibly kaput: the government-sponsored option for health insurance. Could private health insurance companies hope to compete with the federal government? Private insurers railed against their proposed new competitor – and last week, Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND), a Senate Finance Committee member, told Bloomberg News that talk was shifting away from that concept in the Senate and toward nonprofit cooperatives. The House version of the bill still includes the government-run plan.1
Also possibly kaput: mandatory health insurance for employees. In the original conception, businesses would pay federal fines in the future if they refused to provide health coverage to workers. According to Sen. Conrad, the Senate version of the bill would ask businesses to shoulder a portion of the cost of Medicaid coverage received by their workers, or 100% of the Medicaid tab for certain workers poor enough to qualify for a tax credit that could help them buy health insurance.1
If the bill passes, the amount of employer-provided health benefits exempt from income taxation might be limited. Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT), current chair of the Senate Finance Committee, has suggested a $15,000-$17,000 ceiling on that tax exclusion.1
Definitely disliked: the proposals to fiddle with private Medicare plans. The Obama administration has set goals of ending overpayments to Medicare Advantage, which it claims would save the government $177 billion by 2019. In that same time frame, it also wants to use Medicare reimbursements to reduce preventable hospital readmissions – for a conceived $25 billion in additional savings.3 The Obama reforms would also give Medicaid members a bigger prescription drug discount, while reducing that discount for high-income Medicare members.4
In testimony before the House energy and commerce panel, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association senior VP Alissa Fox contended that any cuts in Medicare funding “would cause millions of Medicare Advantage enrollees to lose their coverage and lead to significant reductions in benefits or increases in premiums for millions more.” In addition, Blue Cross, Blue Shield and America’s Health Plan recently presented a letter to Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA), referencing a Milliman study that found the average family of four pays $1,700 a year more than they should in health insurance premiums due to Medicare and Medicaid underpaying hospitals and physicians.1,5
Obama claimed before the American Medical Association that his reforms “will actually extend the life of the Medicare Trust Fund by 7 years and reduce premiums for Medicare beneficiaries by roughly $43 billion over 10 years.”3
The proposed total costs: apparently almost $1 trillion. Sen. Baucus and Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) worked in late June with the Senate Finance Committee to whittle down the House’s $1.6 trillion version of the bill to less than $1 trillion.2
Who pays for it? Tax increases and savings would fund the reforms. More specifically, the President has talked about cutting back the value of the itemized deductions available to the wealthiest American taxpayers. House Ways and Means subcommittee chair Rep. Richard Neal (D-MA) said other ideas a payroll tax and a value-added tax. The Senate seems to prefer the idea of taxing employee health benefits.6
More change likely to come. “We are still early in this process," Obama noted Thursday. “We have not drawn lines in the sand.” Expect those sands to shift further as legislators and lobbyists exert pressures on another of the President’s ambitious reforms in July.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Citations.
1 bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aki1sLcOe4GM [6/26/09]
2 cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/06/25/health.care.proposal/ [6/25/09]
3 usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-06-15-obama-speech-text_N.htm [6/25/09]
4 forbes.com/2009/03/03/obama-health-plan-lifestyle-health_obama_health_budget.html [3/3/09]
5 usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-06-23-health-congress_N.htm [6/23/09]
5 washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/18/AR2009061804053.html [6/18/09]
