ICMC Financial Advisors

Making Cents

Subscribe to ICMC Financial Advisors' Blog: Making Cents

Viewing entries tagged with 'healthcare'

Health Savings Account Advantages

Posted by Curtis A. Smith, CFP® on 25 August 2010 | 0 Comments

Tags: , , , ,

Health Savings Account Advantages

Health Savings Accounts offer more than tax breaks.


Why do people open up Health Savings Accounts in tandem with high-deductible insurance plans? Well, here are some of the compelling reasons why younger, healthier employees decide to have HSAs.

#1: Tax-deductible contributions. These accounts are funded with pre-tax income. Your annual contribution limit to an HSA depends on your age and the type of insurance plan you have in conjunction with the account. For 2010, the limit is set at $3,050 (individual plan) and $6,150 (family plan). If you are older than 55, those limits are nudged $1,000 higher.(source)

0 comments | Read the full post

How Will Health Care Reform Affect Your Small Business?

Posted by Curtis A. Smith, CFP® on 31 March 2010 | 0 Comments

Tags: , , , , , ,

HOW WILL HEALTH CARE REFORM AFFECT YOUR SMALL BUSINESS?

Will OBAMACARE mean headaches … or hidden dividends?

Increased costs or savings in years to come? What do the federal health care reforms mean for your company? Will they lead to thousands of dollars in extra costs and more paperwork? Or will federal subsidies make this a “game changer” for small companies that have struggled to provide insurance plans?

0 comments | Read the full post

Health Care Changes in America

Posted by Curtis A. Smith,CFP® on 23 March 2010 | 1 Comments

Tags: , , , , , , ,

HEALTH CARE CHANGES IN AMERICA

Might this be the end of the debate? Most Definitely Not.


The House approves the Senate bill. Not a single Republican voted for it, but 219 Democrats did – and by a vote of 219-212, the House of Representatives sent the Senate’s version of landmark healthcare legislation toward President Obama’s desk. The President signed the bill into law on March 23.(source)

But the fight is far from over. The House of Representatives also passed a collection of amendments to the Senate bill by a 220-211 margin, but the Senate must also approve this reconciliation bill – exactly as it is worded. If that doesn’t happen, then guess what … there will be another vote on the Senate version of the bill in the House.(source)(source)

“If those people think they’re only going to vote on this once, they’re nuts,” Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) said on Bloomberg Television March 20. Hatch claims that Senate Republicans have the votes to force a modification of the bill passed on March 21 and boot it back to the House for a second vote.(source)

Will the reforms be overturned? Twelve state attorney generals have already filed in court to contest the bill. The conincided with the moment President Obama signed the bill.(source) What are the odds the Supreme Court will throw the reforms out? Probably pretty slim. Look at the precedents of Medicare and Medicaid. When both those federal programs were enacted, the Court twice upheld a broad federal role in health care. Yet, is this time different? The bill has different mandates than Medicare or Medicaid.

The big reforms will take effect in 2014.
If you are looking forward to health insurance reform, you will have to wait a while before many of the big changes occur.

•    Starting in 2014, individuals will be required to have health insurance coverage or pay an annual penalty which could climb to $750 or 2% of their income  (alternately $695 or 2.5% of income), whichever is larger. Inmates, Native Americans, and those with religious objections would be exempted.(source)(source)
•    In 2014, if you aren’t enrolled in an employer-sponsored health care plan, you will have to buy coverage yourself. You could shop for it through a state insurance exchange. The federal government will offer $500 billion worth of assistance to help insurance shoppers buy coverage through these state exchanges. Undocumented immigrants would not be able to buy coverage.(source)(source)
•    After 2014, businesses with more than 50 employees could be fined as much as $2,000 per worker for failing to provide the option of coverage.(source)
•    In 2014, insurers will be required to provide coverage to all Americans regardless of their health status.(source)
•    Medicare spending will be cut by about $500 billion over the next decade, mostly in reduced government payments to Medicare Advantage plans. Democrats have claimed this will not shortchange Medicare recipients.(source)
•    Federal money coming from the bill could not be used for abortions, with exceptions made in cases of rape, incest, or danger to a woman’s life.(source)

What changes are about to happen in 2010? These new rules would go into effect presently thanks to the new law.

•    Insurers will be barred from revoking existing health insurance coverage on an individual, unless fraud or misrepresentation can be shown.(source)
•    Insurers will not be able to limit the amount of money that can eventually be paid out on a health care policy, and it will be harder to limit the amount of money that can be paid out annually.(source)
•    Seniors will get $250 payments to help them out if they face a coverage gap in the middle of the Medicare Part D prescription drug coverage plan.(source)
•    Children will be able to stay on their parents’ health care policies until age 26, and they won’t be denied coverage because of pre-existing health conditions.(source)
•    Adults with pre-existing health conditions will get a chance to enroll in a national high-risk insurance plan – albeit a temporary one.(source)
•    Small businesses that sponsor health care plans for their workers could qualify for tax credits of up to 50% of the cost of the premiums they pay.(source)

New taxes? Yes – starting in 2013. Approval of these reforms will also bring a new 3.8% tax on investment income for individuals earning more than $200,000 and households earning more than $250,000, so the effective capital gains rate will be 23.8% for these taxpayers in 2013. Also, these taxpayers will be able to keep 8.8% less of the income resulting from taxable stock investments. The Medicare tax rate on households with income over $250,000 will also rise in 2013, from 1.45% to 2.35%.(source)(source)(source)

A huge savings? Maybe. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that the health care reforms will reduce the federal deficit by between $65-118 billion over the next decade and by more than $1 trillion in the decade after that.(source) The proof is in the pudding, as all large entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare are all currently bankrupt. Might this add insult to an already bloated national debt? If history is any indication, more than likely the cost of this legislation could be disastrous for the US economy. Time will tell.

Please feel free to forward this article to family, friends or colleagues.
If you would like us to add them to our list, please reply with their address
and we will contact them and ask for their permission to be added.

1 comments | Read the full post

New Careers After Age 50

Posted by Curtis A. Smith, CFP® on 11 March 2010 | 0 Comments

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

New Careers After Age 50

Where The Jobs Are, How to Spruce Up Your Skills and Ready Your Finances for the Change


During the recent recession, many have found themselves back in the job market after age 50 due to layoffs or changing demands at their employers. Yet as life expectancies lengthen, a late career change isn’t always a negative. It may be a welcome chance to renew, re-educate and restart a full life.

It’s possible that in the future, an over-50 career change might become a common event, maybe even a desired event in our society – which means it’s definitely worth planning for.

A visit to a fiduciary fee-only financial planner might be a good first step in planning a move to a second career or dealing with a sudden change in your career prospects. You need to plan for any possible change in income up or down in any opportunity you entertain. You’ll also need to plan how you’ll afford any training you’ll need – college or otherwise – in making that successful transition. To make an over-50 career transition successful, it’s all about preparation. So here are some ideas:

Start with research:
One of the best-detailed, up-to-the-minute career resources for the types of jobs that exist in this country and their salary and hiring forecasts is the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Occupational Outlook Handbook. This extensive online resource not only lists major career groups, but the leading occupations in it. If you haven’t been in the job market for awhile, this kind of research is a good way to reset your knowledge of your industry and whether its hiring prospects are bright. This database also lays out the need for the necessary training required to reach certain salary and career levels.

Check industries that are friendly to older workers:
Healthcare and education are just two industries that are more welcoming to older workers. U.S. News & World Report has come up with its own list of popular over-50 occupations, and it’s a good starting point for people looking for flexible scheduling and other workers their age in the field.

Network:
Face-to-face contact with people in your target fields is important. If you can, check out events at professional organizations in that field or attend casual networking functions to learn more. Being someone over 50, you can get an idea of whether there’s true age diversity in a field and how all those groups work together – or if you’re simply the oldest person in the room. Obviously if you feel welcome, networking will give you a better idea of which companies with someone with your maturity and experience might fit in. Consider adding your profile/resume to Linkedin.

0 comments | Read the full post

Are you Prepared to Pay for Long Term Care?

Posted by Curtis A. Smith, CFP® on 13 November 2009 | 0 Comments

Tags: , , , , ,

ARE YOU PREPARED TO PAY FOR LONG TERM CARE?

In the coming years, many Americans will face the challenge.


70% of people currently over age 65 will require some long term care someday. That is the estimate of the U.S. Administration on Aging, a division of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.(source) Will Medicare or private health insurance pay for it? The short answer is “no”.

In the decades ahead, baby boomers will reach their seventies, eighties and nineties. With aging parents of their own, some are learning how much long term care really costs. Some are still unaware.

How many of us are financially prepared for the possibility?
Here are a couple of “averages” to consider from MetLife’s 2009 survey of LTC costs. The average annual cost of nursing home care is now $79,935 or $219 per day. That’s up 3.3% from 2008. The average nursing home stay is about 2.5 years, which means you would need roughly $200,000 to pay those bills.(source)

Can you imagine paying it out of pocket? Taking out a reverse mortgage to do it? Using Medicaid because you have nothing left? No one wants these financial circumstances. The clear answer is long term care insurance coverage.

How expensive is LTC coverage? Annually, it typically costs about as much as a cheap used car. MarketWatch cited an example from the MetLife survey: in 2009, a 52-year-old federal employee could pay $1,524 annually for an LTC policy with a $200-per-day benefit for three years and a maximum lifetime benefit of about $200,000.(source)

0 comments | Read the full post

House Narrowly Passes Healthcare Reform Bill

Posted by Curtis A. Smith, CFP® on 12 November 2009 | 0 Comments

Tags: , , , ,

HOUSE NARROWLY PASSES HEALTHCARE REFORM BILL

Will the Senate follow?


A narrow victory in the House of Representatives. The Affordable Health Care for America Act (H.R. 3962) passed 220-215 in the House of Representatives on the night of November 7, with 39 Democrats voting no and a lone Republican (Rep. Anh Cao of Louisiana) voting yes.(source) While President Obama lauded passage of the House version of the bill as “historic” and “courageous”, it is still questionable whether any consensus reform bill will land on the President’s desk by the end of 2009.

A tough fight ahead in another.
Right now, the Democratic caucus has the 60 votes needed in the Senate. However, Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Connecticut) says he will readily break away and join the Republican filibuster if the Senate version of the bill includes a public option. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) says it will.(source)

0 comments | Read the full post

The Health Care Debate

Posted by ICMC Staff on 19 August 2009 | 0 Comments

Tags: , ,

CLEARING UP THE HEALTH CARE DEBATE

Who would fund the reforms? Would there really be a “death list”?

Sorting out the possibilities, facts and misconceptions.



The town hall debates over health care reform have ignited Americans like few recent issues. Discourses have become shouting matches. Away from the noise, here is a roundup of where things currently stand.

Who would pay for all this? Over the next 10 years, the federal government will need (by President Obama’s estimation) $950 billion to fund the prosposed health care programs. As planned, roughly a third of the money will be raised through increased revenues (i.e., limiting tax deductions for the wealthiest Americans) and two-thirds of it is supposed to come from reallocations of taxpayer money the federal government is already scheduled to receive(think Medicare savings on the elderly).(source) A coalition of pharmaceutical industry CEOs met with the President in July and have since pledged $80 billion in cost savings over the coming decade to help pay for the reform.(source) From the August 7, 2009 Kiplinger Tax Letter, this is the 2007 tax return data from the IRS: It is apparent who will pay for health care reform, especially with the proposed income tax increases. 

0 comments | Read the full post

Could Small Business Cope with Mandatory Health Insurance?

Posted by Curtis on 22 July 2009 | 0 Comments

Tags: , ,

What would they have to do if health care reforms pass?

 

0 comments | Read the full post

Health Care Reform

Posted by Curtis on 26 June 2009 | 0 Comments

Tags: , ,

HEALTH CARE REFORM


President Obama’s vision may be carried out – in part.

The U.S. is the only developed nation without a comprehensive national health care system. President Barack Obama aims to change all that with a massive reform bill to bring health insurance to 46 million Americans without it over the next 10 years.

Huge reform, huge questions. How much will this cost? Who will pay for it? Could the reform put private health insurers out of business? Will it work? These are just some of the questions swirling around the proposed legislation.

Huge compromises. The most controversial aspects of the bill may soon be watered down. Part of that has to do with cost; part of it has to do with appeasing the private sector. The Senate and House must reconcile different versions of the bill. In the House version, 95% of Americans would be eligible for health coverage; in the Senate version, 97% of Americans would qualify.1,2

Possibly kaput: the government-sponsored option for health insurance.
Could private health insurance companies hope to compete with the federal government? Private insurers railed against their proposed new competitor – and last week, Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND), a Senate Finance Committee member, told Bloomberg News that talk was shifting away from that concept in the Senate and toward nonprofit cooperatives. The House version of the bill still includes the government-run plan.1

Also possibly kaput: mandatory health insurance for employees.
In the original conception, businesses would pay federal fines in the future if they refused to provide health coverage to workers. According to Sen. Conrad, the Senate version of the bill would ask businesses to shoulder a portion of the cost of Medicaid coverage received by their workers, or 100% of the Medicaid tab for certain workers poor enough to qualify for a tax credit that could help them buy health insurance.1

If the bill passes, the amount of employer-provided health benefits exempt from income taxation might be limited. Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT), current chair of the Senate Finance Committee, has suggested a $15,000-$17,000 ceiling on that tax exclusion.1

Definitely disliked: the proposals to fiddle with private Medicare plans. The Obama administration has set goals of ending overpayments to Medicare Advantage, which it claims would save the government $177 billion by 2019. In that same time frame, it also wants to use Medicare reimbursements to reduce preventable hospital readmissions – for a conceived $25 billion in additional savings.3 The Obama reforms would also give Medicaid members a bigger prescription drug discount, while reducing that discount for high-income Medicare members.4

In testimony before the House energy and commerce panel, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association senior VP Alissa Fox contended that any cuts in Medicare funding “would cause millions of Medicare Advantage enrollees to lose their coverage and lead to significant reductions in benefits or increases in premiums for millions more.” In addition, Blue Cross, Blue Shield and America’s Health Plan recently presented a letter to Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA), referencing a Milliman study that found the average family of four pays $1,700 a year more than they should in health insurance premiums due to Medicare and Medicaid underpaying hospitals and physicians.1,5

Obama claimed before the American Medical Association that his reforms “will actually extend the life of the Medicare Trust Fund by 7 years and reduce premiums for Medicare beneficiaries by roughly $43 billion over 10 years.”3

The proposed total costs: apparently almost $1 trillion. Sen. Baucus and Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) worked in late June with the Senate Finance Committee to whittle down the House’s $1.6 trillion version of the bill to less than $1 trillion.2

Who pays for it?
Tax increases and savings would fund the reforms. More specifically, the President has talked about cutting back the value of the itemized deductions available to the wealthiest American taxpayers. House Ways and Means subcommittee chair Rep. Richard Neal (D-MA) said other ideas a payroll tax and a value-added tax. The Senate seems to prefer the idea of taxing employee health benefits.6

More change likely to come
. “We are still early in this process," Obama noted Thursday. “We have not drawn lines in the sand.” Expect those sands to shift further as legislators and lobbyists exert pressures on another of the President’s ambitious reforms in July.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Citations.
1 bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aki1sLcOe4GM [6/26/09]
2 cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/06/25/health.care.proposal/ [6/25/09]
3 usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-06-15-obama-speech-text_N.htm [6/25/09]
4 forbes.com/2009/03/03/obama-health-plan-lifestyle-health_obama_health_budget.html [3/3/09]
5 usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-06-23-health-congress_N.htm [6/23/09]
5 washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/18/AR2009061804053.html [6/18/09]

0 comments | Read the full post

The best way out is always through.
— Robert Frost