Making Cents

What a Difference a Year Makes!

Posted by Curtis A. Smith, CFP® on 7 April 2010 | 0 Comments

Tags: Economic, Commodities, Financial Planning, Foreign Markets, Investing, Quarterly Update, Core Series,

 

The quarter in brief. The opening quarter of 2010 can be summed up in four words: so far, so good. Despite murmurs warning us of a correction, a double dip recession, and a tepid recovery with sustained high unemployment, stocks appreciated nicely this quarter. It was a quarter in which major healthcare reforms became law, the dollar made a comeback, the housing market lagged and the global economy revved up its collective engines. Despite murmurs and warnings that the recovery was going to be weak and prolonged, it was a very positive time for investors.

Domestic economic health. Consumer spending, obviously the prime driver in a recovery, increased by 0.4% in January and 0.3% in February.(source) Consumer sentiment was up and down: in the Reuters poll, it went from 74.4 in January to 73.6 in both February and March, about where it was last September.(source)(source) The Conference Board survey read 52.5 for March, up from 46.4 a month earlier yet below January’s reading.

0 comments | Read the full post

March 2010 Monthly Economic Update

Posted by Curtis A. Smith,CFP® on 6 April 2010 | 1 Comments

Tags: Core Series, Economic, Commodities, Foreign Markets, Stock Market, NASDAQ, S&P 500, DJIA, Investing, Financial Planning

March 2010 Monthly Economic Update

The month in brief. Stocks rocketed north in March. The DJIA, NASDAQ and S&P 500 all advanced between 5.2-7.2% for the month.(source) Whispers about a double-dip recession, a possible correction and prolonged malaise in the real estate sector were not loud enough to take the market out of rally mode. Shouts of victory and shouts of anger accompanied the passage of the President’s long-envisioned health care reforms. Economically, slow and reasonably assured growth seemed the order of the day.

Domestic economic health. First the indicators, then over to Congress. March’s ISM manufacturing index came in at a very strong 59.6, and the ISM service sector index read 55.4.(source) Durable goods orders rose by 0.6% in February, the tenth advance in the last 11 months.(source) Data showed personal spending up 0.3% for February, even as personal wages were flat.(source) It was hard to get a fix on consumer confidence. The Conference Board’s index soared from 46.5 in February to 52.5 in March, even as the IBD and University of Michigan indexes fell.(source)

1 comments | Read the full post

February 2010 Monthly Economic Update

Posted by Curtis A. Smith, CFP® on 12 March 2010 | 0 Comments

Tags: Core Series, Economic, Commodities, Foreign Markets, Stock Markets, NASDAQ, S&P 500, DJIA, Investing, Financial Planning

0 comments | Read the full post

January 2010 Monthly Economic Update

Posted by Curtis A. Smith, CFP® on 2 February 2010 | 0 Comments

Tags: Economic, Core Series, Investing, Financial Planning, Foreign Stocks, Commodities, Interest Rates, Federal Reserve, Housing

 

The month in brief. Wall Street had an eye on Washington for much of last month. Anticipation of earnings season gave way to concern over what might happen if proposed limits on bank risk went into effect, and what might happen if federal tax credits in the housing market went away. Stock and commodities markets fared poorly as some economic data led traders, economists and investors to wonder how much of the recession recovery was attributable to government measures. Still, consumer confidence was on the rise and the economy was clearly on the mend.

Domestic economic health. Some very good news arrived in January: according to the Commerce Department, the preliminary 4Q GDP reading was +5.7%, the best quarter in six years and 1.0% higher than the expectations of analysts. Consumer spending represented 2.0% of the gain. Additionally, the Conference Board’s survey of consumer confidence hit a two-year high last month.(source) The University of Michigan consumer sentiment poll rose by 1.6 points to 74.4.(source) The latest consumer spending data showed a 0.2% gain for December. January also brought the best news on factory output in five years – the Institute for Supply Management’s manufacturing index read 58.4 for the month.(source)

Other news items bothered the Street. In late January, President Obama rolled out a proposal he referred to as “the Volcker rule”. Developed with input from former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker and former SEC chair William Donaldson, the rule would prohibit banks and bank holding firms from getting involved in hedge funds or conducting proprietary trading operations.(source) Intended as a corrective to the behavior of the 2000s, the proposed limits on bank size and bank risk sent stocks skidding, as investors saw reduced potential for bank profits. Tightening in China, debt problems in Greece and a downgrade of the U.K.’s banking system didn’t help the mood.

In terms of rates we all watch, things stayed pretty much the same: the benchmark interest rate remained between 0-0.25% after the latest Federal Open Market Committee meeting, and the Senate reconfirmed Ben Bernanke as Fed chair. We learned that the jobless rate stayed flat in December at 10.0%.(source) The inflation rate (CPI) had inched north 0.1% for December, up 2.7% over the last 12 months with core CPI rising 1.8% in that stretch.(source)

A previously obscure Massachusetts state senator became a person of influence on Capitol Hill. The unexpected election of Sen. Scott Brown (R-MA) effectively derailed passage of the Obama administration’s seemingly assured healthcare reforms. White House press secretary Robert Gibbs claimed that the health care reform bill was still “inside the five-yard line.” There were signals that health insurance reform might be the new tack.(source) This was great news during January!

Global economic health. Concerned about an overheated economy, China told its commercial banks to boost capital ratios; that led to the worst market day in Asia since early November, and it was the first in a series of cautions from the government.(source) China’s GDP was +10.7% in 4Q 2009 with December showing amazing annualized gains in industrial output (+18.5%) and retail sales (+17.5%).(source) The Bank of Japan forecast moderate improvement for that nation’s economy; Japan’s jobless rate fell to 5.1% in December, and its vehicle sales went north in January for the sixth consecutive month.(source)

In Europe, the government of Greece wrestled with a $75 billion budget deficit. Standard and Poor’s took the United Kingdom’s banking system off of its global list of “most stable and low-risk” banking systems.(source) Yet Eurozone consumer confidence increased for the tenth consecutive month in January, even as the latest figures showed unemployment had reached 10.0% for November.(source)(source)

World financial markets. Indices in a few of the BRIC nations posted gains last month. Venezuela’s Caracas General pulled off a 7.7% increase, and Russia’s RTSI rose 3.3%; the Jakarta Composite in Indonesia gained 3.0%. (The world’s best performing index was the CASE 30 in Egypt, which rose 7.8% last month.) Most world indices took monthly losses, as follows: Hang Seng, -8.0%; Shanghai Composite, -8.8%; Sensex, -6.3%; All Ordinaries, -5.9%; Nikkei 225, -3.3%; STOXX 600, -2.4%; DAX, -5.9%; CAC 40, -5.0%; FTSE 100, -4.1%. The MSCI World Index fell 3.67% in local currency terms; the MSCI Emerging Markets index lost 4.47% in January.(source)(source)(source)

Commodities markets. Most commodities struggled on the NYMEX last month. Three posted January gains of 5% or better: coal, +8.31%; sugar, +9.80%; orange juice, +5.46%. Platinum prices went up 3.15% and palladium prices gained 0.93%. Gold lost 1.20%, silver 3.89% and copper 8.79%. Gold ended the month at $1,083.00 per ounce. Crude oil, which finished January at $72.89 per barrel, lost 8.15% for the month. Crops were hit hardest, with soybeans down 12.83%, wheat down 12.47%, corn down 13.99% and oats down 17.69%. The U.S. Dollar Index gained 2.07% last month.(source)

Housing & interest rates. What would happen with the housing market without federal subsidies in place? The latest new and existing home sales figures made analysts wonder. Purchases of existing homes fell by 16.7% while new home purchases dipped 7.6%; both figures reflected the assumption that government tax credits were expiring.(source) Construction spending slipped 1.2% in December.(source) On the bright side, National Association of Realtors tallies put existing home sales for 2009 approximately 5% above levels of 2008.(source)

What about mortgage rates? Did 30-year FRMs manage to average under 5% for another month? The answer is yes. On January 28, Freddie Mac tracked average interest rates on 30-year FRMs at 4.98%. Rates on 15-year FRMs were averaging 4.39%, rates on 5-year hybrid ARMs were averaging 4.25% and rates on 1-year ARMs averaged 4.29%.(source)

Major indexes. January brought some chills to Wall Street, with the proposed “Volcker rule” and concerns about financial pressures in China, England and Greece affecting the three marquee indices.

 

0 comments | Read the full post

The Decade in Review

Posted by ICMC Staff on 28 January 2010 | 0 Comments

Tags: Lost Decade, Investing, Financial Planning, Economic, Commodities

A turbulent ten years. The 2000s gave us remarkable opportunity and remarkable volatility. They tested our patience, and many investment strategies. They taught us to hold on, hang in there and diversify.

Stocks. Was it really a “lost decade”? It depends on how you were invested. Yes, the Dow ended the 1990s at 11,497.12 and ended the 2000s at 10,428.05, amounting to a 9.30% slip. The S&P 500 lost 24.10% in the same interval. If you had invested a lump sum into an index fund tracking the S&P 500 on December 31, 1999 and left those assets untouched for ten years, you would have ended up with a sizable loss.(source)(source)

Well, that sounds dismal - but how many of us actually invest this way? Very few of us make one lump sum investment and just watch it for ten years. Thanks to diversification, rebalancing and constant inflows of new money, quite a few investors were able to grow their assets and/or outperform the S&P 500 in the past decade.

The fact is, five sectors of the S&P 500 gained 10% or more across the 2000s – health care (+10.85%), utilities (+10.92%), materials (+24.91%), consumer staples (+31.84%) and energy (+102.12%).(source)

Few articles about the “lost decade” mention this notable factoid: the Russell 2000 advanced 23.90% during the 2000s.(source) Mutual funds that focused on buying undervalued small-company stocks gained an average of 8.3% annually in the 2000s.(source)

Outside America, developing stock markets shattered all expectations while the developed markets mirrored American performance. Look at the decade-long gains in key indices in some of the BRIC nations, as measured by CNBC.com: China, +72%; India, +249%; Brazil, +301%; Russia, +863%. Compare those gains with the benchmark indices in Japan (-44%), France (-34%), Great Britain (-22%) and Germany (-14%) in the past decade.(source) Emerging market mutual funds gained an average of 9.3% per year in the last ten years.(source)

Commodities. It was a decade of amazing gains in the broad commodities market. From the end of 1999 to the end of 2009, gold advanced 278.52%. How about silver and copper? Silver gained 208.91% and king copper rose 287.78%. Crude oil rose 210.00% during the 2000s.(source)

How great a decade was it for the commodities sector? Only one notable commodity posted a ten-year loss from 12/31/1999 to 12/31/2009. That was palladium, which retreated 8.98%. On the other hand, we know that 16 commodities gained 100% or more across the decade.(source)

The two biggest gainers during the 2000s were a pair of crops: sugar (+340.36%) and cocoa (+293.31%).(source)

Highs and lows. We are 10 years past the bursting of the tech bubble – March 10 will mark the 10th anniversary of the NASDAQ’s all-time high of 5,132.50.5 And of course, a decade-defining geopolitical event rocked the markets 18 months later.

General Motors and Chrysler filed for bankruptcy protection in 2009; at the start of the decade, so did Enron - the company that Fortune Magazine ranked as “most innovative” each year from 1995-2000.(source) In 2008, Lehman Brothers, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, and Washington Mutual either folded, mutated, or were bought up while AIG, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were bailed out.

The Dow hit a new high of 11,723 in January 2000, a post-9/11 closing low of 7,286 in October 2002, and then ended 2003 at 10,453 (as the DJIA gained 25.32% that year while the dollar lost 14.67%). The Dow hit new peaks of 11,727 on October 3, 2006 and 14,164 on October 9, 2007. A close of 11,215 on July 2, 2008 officially marked the start of a bear market.(source)

From March 9, 2009 closing lows to the end of the year, the Dow shot up 59.28% and the S&P 500 advanced 64.83%.(source) This led to some to entertain tantalizing thoughts about the birth of a new bull market. Or it is simply a cyclical bull in a secular bear? The jury is still out, as the saying goes; we can hope for the best.

What did we learn? The 2000s taught us lessons about irrational exuberance (companies that had never made a dime were probably not worth billions) and lessons about the value of diversifying your portfolio. We also learned lessons in perseverance – those who stayed invested have seen their portfolios make a strong recovery.

The 2000s put investors through some seemingly unimaginable financial headlines. It was a rare decade, an aberrant one in stock market history – for example, the Dow hadn’t had a negative decade since the 1930s, and it had advanced 228.25% over the 1980s and 317.59% for the 1990s.(source) Will we see it make a double- or triple-digit advance in the next ten years? We don’t know. Past performance is no indicator of future success. Yet the awesome potential of the stock market should not be dismissed – and with economies healing the world over, it is clearly time to look forward and stay invested.

0 comments | Read the full post